Adult affiliate photo content watermarks with www or without

[Peter]

HI All, I know its been asked in the past on the other site but things also change so rapidly these days. I have seen some adult affiliate image content plastered with logos and separate watermarks and model names – which seems excessive and would not be appreciated by those using the images to promote such a pay site ?

Is a plain bottom right hand corner sitename.com ok ? OR just a logo eg without the .com

I understand the advantages as to why a pay site owner prefers the .com and why the affiliate might prefer just the logo without .com
but as everyone seems to follow one of three things – we are unsure what to do ?

thanks Peter

[Mr Adult Affiliate]

I would use sitename.com, no point adding the www though. That way if they decide to visit your site they know what it is. No mistakes. I do not see any harm in having watermarks, makes senses to me to use it. It is just a matter of doing it tastefully, not too big or obtrusive. Do not plaster huge logo in the middle of the images, that will just piss people off including your members.

[smartape]

WWW is not necessary any longer for browsers so even if a surfer doesn’t type that in they still make it to the site.

In addition, it actually visually makes the site name less visible so why use it.

[marktoan]

I wouldn’t use www either.

[JustAlex]

We just use logos, but some affiliates (tube sites) require us to add extra text! I don’t like it but we have little choice, so on request we make different versions for different affiliates.

[Peter]

thanks guys, appreciated.

[morais]

I wouldnt use “www” either and I guess if your brand is strong enough you might not need the “.com”.

[Author]

Posts